Oyster World Wolwedans Game Farm Delfinos.Passion for food-Passion for life Property Pointer Reflexions Professional Hair Top Up Service Station Beach House Restaurant Ponto Grille and Carvery Skorpios Security

 

MosselbayonTheline | First With The News

“Stephan must simply stick to his story. The man with the most money will win the case.”

 These were among the strange words and behaviour of Dr Lawton Vosloo of Jeffreys Bay two days after the deaths of his son and his son’s fiancée in the controversial Kareedouw murder case. The Hoon family say these remarks prompted them, already after the joint funeral service, to seek the assistance of renowned private investigator Mike Bolhuis. When it became clear that Bolhuis’s services would be too expensive, they appointed another private investigator, Leon Rossouw, to allay their fears and attempt to find answers to troubling questions.
These revelations by the traumatised Hoon family come a week after sentencing in the contentious case in which the well-known Kareedouw farmer, Kevin Pretorius (53), was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment without bail for the alleged “gassing death” of Jéan Vosloo (25) and Mari Hoon (28) in the shower of the popular Kouga Kliphuis on Pretorius’s family farm, Zuuranys.
 
Mari Hoon en Jéan Vosloo mooie                                                    Mari Hoon and Jéan Vosloo
 
Pretorius’s neighbour’s son, Stephan du Plessis (now 30), discovered the couple in the shower on the Sunday morning after he had invited them, with Pretorius’s permission, to come and braai and relax there free of charge, even though the Kliphuis was officially closed to guests during the Covid-19 lockdown. Pretorius has been held in the high-security St Albans prison since last Friday while awaiting a court date for his new legal team’s appeals against the conviction and sentence.
Stephan du Plessis           Stephan du Plessis Kevin mooi  Kevin Pretorius
 
Sakkie (66) and Maria (61) Hoon and their two daughters, Michelle (40) and Suné (36), have for five years carried a double burden of disturbing questions and uncertainties surrounding the strange death of their beloved youngest daughter and sister.
 
                             The Hoon family fltr are Michelle, Sakkie, Suné, Maria and Mari
 
 Since the rapid cremation and joint funeral service on 2 May 2020, arranged by Dr Vosloo and his wife Christel in Jeffreys Bay, they have been trying to get someone in authority to pay attention to their questions and objections. This follows allegations that the Vosloo couple had already removed all the couple’s clothing and belongings on the same day the bodies were found in the shower on Sunday morning, 26 April 2020. Some of the clothing was also washed by the Vosloos, and reddish-brown stains on Mari’s jersey that they claimed they could not remove were dismissed as red wine stains.
 
Dr Vosloo allegedly also declared the couple dead at the scene himself and has since played a leading role in all aspects of the police and post-mortem investigations, the autopsy, cremation and joint funeral service — all of which were completed within a week.
 
Lawton en Christel Vosloo                                                                        Dr Lawton and Christel Vosloo
 
When Suné and her husband Rudi went to the Vosloos’ home in Jeffreys Bay the afternoon after the funeral service and insisted on getting Mari’s cellphone back — which the Vosloos had earlier refused to return with her other belongings — they were allegedly told the phone could not be returned because the police needed it. Suné then suggested that they meet the Vosloos the following day at the Kareedouw police station where she would hand in Mari’s phone if the Vosloos would also submit Jéan’s phone. This apparently caused the Vosloos to change their minds.
“If there is anything on this phone that contributed to my son’s death, I will sue you and your entire family.”
Dr Lawton Vosloo allegedly closed the front door and left them outside while he went to fetch the phone in the house. The phone was fully charged and sealed in a zip-lock bag when he angrily handed it to her with those words. Suné says she was so taken aback that she replied: “But if they died of carbon monoxide poisoning, how could something on the phone have caused their death?” Vosloo allegedly responded only: “No, no — I’m just saying.”
The Hoon family were so traumatised by the strange circumstances in which the couple died, the inadequate police investigation — in which no cellphone analyses or proper cross-examinations were conducted — and the swift cremation, that they all lost their jobs and at one stage lived and worked together on a farm.
 
What particularly continues to haunt the two Hoon sisters is the scene in the mortuary in Jeffreys Bay. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic there was a massive backlog with autopsies and the waiting list was reportedly three to five weeks. Thanks to Dr Vosloo’s influence they apparently managed to move quickly at the Jeffreys Bay mortuary.
 
When the Hoon sisters had to rush Mari’s favourite clothes there on 29 April 2020 and insisted on doing her make-up themselves for their final farewell, Mari was reportedly deathly pale compared to Jéan’s purplish-red colouring. There was also allegedly a deep dark indentation on the right side of her skull, blood on her left ear and a wide white plaster around her neck.
When they asked the undertaker about this, he allegedly said it was due to the autopsy. When asked why Jéan did not have similar marks or a plaster on his neck, they were allegedly told it was “because he received a different type of autopsy”.
 
Rossouw, the private investigator who has since reportedly disappeared, said when approached that he could not obtain access at the time to the original police photographs and court records, even though he worked through an attorney as is customary. Both he and the Hoons personally contacted the state prosecutor, Johan Jansen, to pass on new information, but he allegedly said he was not interested and did not work with private investigators.
According to Rossouw, he later also brought WhatsApp messages between Mari Hoon and a friend in Pretoria to the attention of Kevin’s attorney, Alwyn Griebenow, to confirm contradictions in the state’s timeline. Griebenow was supposed to call him back later, but apparently never did.
 
Kevin hof7     State prosecutor Johan Jansen Alwyn Griebenow           Original defence attorney Alwyn Griebenow
 
The Hoon sisters both spoke publicly in recent weeks in separate interviews after the involvement of forensic expert Dr David Klatzow and the appointment of a new Cape Town legal team led by Advocate Francois van Zyl.
Suné said in candid discussions that the Hoon family had suspected from the beginning that something was wrong and had searched for answers, but because of limited funds they could not conduct further investigations themselves.
 
“Dr Lawton’s strange words and behaviour so soon after their deaths, and Stephan’s testimony that he knows nothing about what happened that night, were very strange and disturbing to us. Also the extremely rapid autopsies, cremation and funeral within a week before any investigation had been conducted or before we could even begin to process our grief and properly say goodbye to Mari.”
They had wanted Bolhuis or a private investigator to examine the original autopsy reports and check the cellphone records of Stephan and Jéan, but when Rossouw achieved nothing and did not return to them, they no longer knew what to do.
 
“Even when the state prosecutor showed no interest in following up our information, we were astonished. But these things still eat away at our family like a cancer and prevent us from finding closure,” she said.
 
Michelle Hoon and her husband Niel also revealed in an interview with Dr David Klatzow that the couple were not as happy as media rumours had suggested and that Jéan was extremely possessive and jealous. He allegedly often took Mari’s phone and confronted her aggressively. Michelle also confirmed the remarks Dr Lawton Vosloo had made at the time in the presence of witnesses in a signed statement.
 
Hoon_verklaring_sonder_ID.jpg
 
At Kevin Pretorius’s very first court appearance — when he was suddenly formally charged with double murder — Mari’s mother Maria specifically informed the state prosecutor Johan Jansen about the questions and irregularities troubling them. She also told him about a disturbing late-night WhatsApp conversation Mari had on the night in question with a family friend in Pretoria.
This nearly hour-long conversation from 22:29 to 23:19, in which Mari apparently wanted to reveal “serious matters”, contradicted Stephan’s testimony that Jéan and Mari had gone to shower at about 20:30 and 21:00 respectively and were supposedly overcome by carbon monoxide. Jansen reportedly said they could not introduce that information because it would harm the state’s case.
 
 
https://www.weskusontheline.co.za/2025/10/22/kliphouse-tragedy-to-claim-another-innocent-victim-due-to-media-driven-need-for-revenge/
 
Suné said: “When our family arrived in Jeffreys Bay on 28 April, all of Mari’s clothes and belongings had already been removed from the cottage on the Kenmore farm where Mari and Jéan had lived together and were neatly stored in the Vosloos’ garage.”
The couple and several other young people lived and worked on the Kenmore farm of Grasslands Agriculture about 37 km outside Kareedouw.
“Aunt Christel (Vosloo) gave us Mari’s weekend and make-up bags, as well as the clothes she had worn at the Kliphuis. She cried and said she wanted to return the clothes clean. She said she could not remove the reddish-brown stains on the jersey where Mari had probably spilled red wine on herself. She also gave us Mari’s earrings, but not her engagement ring or cellphone. When my mother asked about it, she said Jéan had worked hard and paid a lot for it and she had decided to keep it herself because they were not yet married.”
“It was extremely upsetting for our parents that they could not pack Mari’s belongings themselves in the places where she had lived and spent her final night. My parents then went with Aunt Christel into their home on the Kenmore farm while Michelle, her husband Niel and I stood outside with Dr Vosloo waiting. It was then that Dr Vosloo suddenly said: ‘Stephan must just stick to his story. The man with the most money will win the case.’”
“We were stunned, because it was only two days after their deaths and there had been no talk of a court case yet as everyone still saw it as a tragic freak accident.”
 
Other aspects troubling the Hoons are that Mari allegedly still had her earrings in when the couple were found naked in the shower. According to the sisters it had always been a family tradition never to shower or sleep wearing earrings or jewellery.
 
When the Hoons first visited the Kouga Kliphuis on 1 May 2020, there was no sign of a cordoned-off crime scene. There were splashes and stains that looked like blood near the steps of the braai area, and when Stephan was asked about it he allegedly said it was sauce and juice from the boerewors they had braaied on the Saturday night. Other similar splashes that were photographed in a bedroom and in the shower were apparently never questioned or investigated. Neither were strange finger and drag marks on the inside windows of one of the bedrooms.
 
 
The Hoons are struggling to find closure while so many unanswered questions continue to trouble them.
“We felt sorry for Pretorius from the beginning because we believed he would never deliberately cause anyone’s death, but we also wanted answers and justice. When all the evidence against him began emerging in court without counter-evidence from his legal team, we started believing that he must be guilty, even though all the other issues still troubled us.
 
“It was only when all the questions we have struggled with from the beginning began appearing in the media and Dr Klatzow confirmed everything that we regained the courage to fight for the full truth about what really happened that night. We are not hateful and do not seek revenge — we only want the full truth to come out so that we can understand, justice can be done and we can find closure.”
 
 
Two families mourning a beloved child, brother and sister. The Vosloo family (left) believe a beloved Kareedouw farmer must pay with imprisonment for their son’s death so that they can find closure; the Hoon family believe the full truth must first emerge before they will truly be able to make peace with the death of their beloved daughter and sister.
 
Vosloo gesinHoon gesin1 600x400
 
While the controversial and exhausting court case continues after five years, family and friends of Kevin — who have visited the Kouga Kliphuis for years — helped in December 2025 to clean and renovate the building and surroundings after it had stood empty for so long. The hundreds of people who have spent wonderful times there over the past 25 years remain firmly behind him in proving his innocence.
A crowdfunding campaign has meanwhile been launched to raise funds for his legal costs:
 
 
Also read the Afrikaans version here: 
 
https://www.weskusontheline.co.za/2026/03/02/agter-die-skerms-van-die-kareedouw-tragedie-hoon-sussies-maak-hart-skoon/
 
 
 
Kevin kinders in STORTInnocent photo of children washing and playing in the Kouga Kliphuis shower in December 2025 - long after the tragedy. Photo with permission of parents
Related Articles:
 
THEY ARE GROWING THE COVID-19 VIRUS IN SOUTH AFRICA
 
"Listen to the clip below. From the 38th minute, a W.H.O. Doctor says more than twice that South Africa is "growing the Covid virus" and is testing if it can mutate. She then goes on to say that they as W.H.O are watching what South Africa is busy doing "with interest".
Why has Cyril never disclosed this to South Africans? Why was our government playing with such fire? South Africa can't run one power station successfully, but it plays with our lives by agreeing to "grow the virus and test if it can mutate" on our South African soil?
That is why Cyril was crying, the burden of what he and his government has exposed us to is unforgivable."
- Vytjie Mentor 
 
4 years ago I warned that President Cyril Ramaphosa would be the most dangerous president South Africa has ever had. People laughed. In 2018 President Ramaphosa said he would forge a New World Order. People then voted for him and his satanic globalist agenda. Now that Ramaphosa is doing exactly what he said, people are complaining. The evil, deaths and devastation we have experienced in our country is only the beginning. What is happening is part of the NWO depopulation agenda - it's not about saving lives, it's about controlling and destroying lives.
 
Covid-19 was used as a political tool by the elite, satanists, liberals, communists, globalist leaders and corrupt politicians to usher in the New World Order. The blood of many people will be on their hands.
 
May the Lord help us. Our hope and trust is in God, not in a wicked government.
 
Esther Meshoe
 

https://youtu.be/U15sSanhJaM

Streamed live on Dec 28, 2020

 May be an image of text

 Next lockdown in SA predicted to start on 2 December 2021 - to kill the economy effectively? 

Dr. Susan Vosloo, one of South Africa's most renowned Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons and a good friend of the late prof. Chris Barnard, has been speaking up against the draconic Covid lockdown and treatment protocols since March 2020, but she and thousands of SA like-minded medical experts have been ignored, ridiculed and discredited by the same SA mainstream media that used to quote them regularly as experts on health issues. 

Read her Covid diary that was published on 5 August 2020: 

"As this is written, still unable to travel, Malta's sunshine is sorely missed. It's mid-winter in the Southern hemisphere. Facing consequences of strategies applied to the novel Covid-19 pandemic, we drift on a tragic trajectory worldwide, particularly in Africa.

"One wonders: Are the 'blind' leading the sheeple? The only thing worse than being blind, is having sight, but no vision?"

Dr Susan Vosloo and family

Dr. Susan Vosloo with anesthetist husband Anton and their twin daughters (Photo: Marie Benoit)

https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2020-08-05/newspaper-lifestyleculture/Marie-Benoit-s-Diary-Corona-Chronicles-Covid-19-in-2020-An-African-perspective-6736225831

Covid-19 vaccines – the raging debate after Dr Susan Vosloo’s controversial video

https://www.biznews.com/undictated/2021/08/17/covid-19-vaccines-vosloo

No photo description available.

YET, literally TENS of THOUSANDS of experienced and renowned top medical experts in SA and across the world are confirming Dr. Vosloo's views and have been trying non-stop to get their serious messages and warnings to the public despite the worst media censorship in history. 

1. Dr. Nancy Banks -
2. Dr. Russell Blaylock -
3. Dr. Shiv Chopra -
4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny -
5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries - http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
6. Dr. Larry Palevsky - http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
7. Dr. Toni Bark - http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield - http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo
9. Dr. Meryl Nass - http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc
10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin - http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl
11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot - http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL
12. Dr. Robert Rowen - http://bit.ly/1SIELeF
13. Dr. David Ayoub - http://bit.ly/1SIELve
14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD - http://bit.ly/1KsdVby
15. Dr. Rashid Buttar - http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6
16. Dr. Roby Mitchell - http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU
17. Dr. Ken Stoller - http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI
18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein - http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH
19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD - http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI
20. Dr. David Davis - http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo
21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych - http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J
22. Dr. Harold E Buttram - http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df
23. Dr. Kelly Brogan - http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ
24. Dr. RC Tent - http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu
25. Dr. Rebecca Carley - http://bit.ly/K49F4d
26. Dr. Andrew Moulden - http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu
27. Dr. Jack Wolfson - http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA
28. Dr. Michael Elice - http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA
29. Dr. Terry Wahls - http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd
30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff - http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY
31. Dr. Paul Thomas - http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf
32. Many doctors talking at once - http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv
33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz - censored
34. Dr. Jane Orient - http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb
35. Dr. Richard Deth - http://bit.ly/1GQDL10
36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic - http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5
37. Dr Chris Shaw - http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp
38. Dr. Susan McCreadie - http://bit.ly/1CqqN83
39. Dr. Mary Ann Block - http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX
40. Dr. David Brownstein - http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A
41. Dr. Jayne Donegan - http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz
42. Dr. Troy Ross - censored 
43. Dr. Philip Incao - http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS
44. Dr. Joseph Mercola - http://bit.ly/18dE38I
45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet - http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC
46. Dr. Robert Mendelson - http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr
 
More doctors testifying that vaccines aren't safe or effective, in these documentaries. WHY are their warnings and concerns ignored by the mainstream media?  
 
1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic - http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W
2. The Greater Good - http://bit.ly/1icxh8j
3. Shots In The Dark - http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h
4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth - http://bit.ly/KEYDUh
5. Vaccine Nation - http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU
6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines - http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU
7. Lethal Injection - http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ
9. Deadly Immunity -
10. Autism - Made in the USA - http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5
11. Beyond Treason - http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt
12. Trace Amounts - http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv
13. Why We Don't Vaccinate -
 
9 hour court case
 
Documentaries...  
 
 1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic(2013)
 
 
2. The Greater Good - (2011)
 
 
3. Shots In The Dark -(2009)
 
 
4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -(1998)
 
 
5. Vaccine Nation - (2008)
 
 
6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines -
 
 
7. Lethal Injection - http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ
 
8. Bought - (2015)
 
 
9. Deadly Immunity - (2005)
 
 
10. Autism - Made in the USA(2009)
 
 

11. Beyond Treason - (2005)

 

 

Related Articles:

‘Vaccine Mania’: Fauci, Big Pharma Detail Plans for ‘Indefinite’ Rollout of Shots

At a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s Davos Agenda 2022, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel and colleagues, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.

  • Moderna is actively working with “Fauci’s team” to create a new shot for fall 2022. Moderna is also developing an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022.
  • Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.”
  • An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was reached in January 2022.
  • Additional shots are in development to target HIV, zika virus, Nipah virus, cancer, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, influenza (mRNA) and more.

Many experts have sounded the alarm that the COVID-19 pandemic was all about the shot and a larger agenda to impose totalitarian control worldwide. Already, one shot has turned into two doses and a third booster.

fourth booster is also being discussed, including by Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, who said that the efficacy of the third shot is likely to decline over several months, necessitating another shot soon thereafter.

“I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great,” Bancel said in an interview with Goldman Sachs.

Conveniently, Moderna is working on an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022 — and this is only the beginning.

Writing on Substack, contributor Eugyppius explained:

“Moderna, just one of multiple pharmaceuticals eager to exploit our new vaccine mania, are expanding their manufacturing capacity to produce as many as 6 billion mRNA vaccine doses per year.”

The information came straight from the horse’s mouth, at a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, at a session titled “COVID-19: What’s Next?

Along with Bancel, the meeting was attended by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Richard Hatchett, CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, and professor Annelies Wilder-Smith from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who together detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.

 

 READ HERE ABOUT THE AMENDMENTS TO THE COVID REGULATIONS IN SA

https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/202202/45855rg11389gon1715.pdf

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fauci-big-pharma-rollout-vaccine-shots/

Related Articles:
 
Die permanente skorsing van Mosselbaai se mees omstrede munispale bestuurder Thys Giliomee ná klagte van seksuele wangedrag wat intern ondersoek is, het uiteenlopende reaksies ontlok.
 
Thys Giliomee1 
 
Aan die eenkant is daar dié wat sedert sy onkonvensionele en omstrede "politieke aanstelling" einde 2016 sy ervaring en werksetiek bevraagteken het. Die feit dat hy as voormalige hoof-uitvoerende beampte van die Wes-Kaapse Drankraad boonop geïmpliseer is in 'n voortslepende forensiese ondersoek weens beweerde wanbesteding van R9 miljoen vir kantoormeubilering, het ook die wenkbroue laat lig.
 
Aan die anderkant is daar diegene wat reken hy het Mosselbaai goed bestuur en sal gemis word.
 
Seksklagte intern ondersoek
 
Giliomee se skorsing volg ná klagte van seksuele teistering wat in Mei vanjaar na bewering deur een of meer vroue teen hom aanhangig gemaak is. Die besonderhede van die klagte en klaagsters is deurgaans streng vertroulik gehou en intern ondersoek.
 
Die Munisipaliteit het gister net in 'n kort Engelse mediaverklaring aangekondig dat Giliomee ná indringende samesprekinge die voorwaardes vir sy onmiddellike afdanking aanvaar. Die besonderhede van dié voorwaardes en die skikkingsbedrag met die klaagsters is ook nie bekend gemaak nie.
 
Giliomee is op 1 Desember 2016 onder 'n wolk van omstredenheid aangestel nadat die normale prosedures glo nie gevolg is en alle raadslede nie in die saak geken is nie. Die grootste besware nadat hy destyds dr. Michelle Gratz opgevolg het ná haar skok-bedanking, is dat dit 'n geforseerde "politieke"aanstelling was en dat hy nie die vereiste 5 jaar ervaring as munisipale bestuurder het nie.
 
municipal
 
Goeie tye in hoë kringe: Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit se sesde skoon oudit vir die 2016/17 finansiële boekjaar is in 2018 luisterryk gevier. Die Ouditeur-generaal Kimi Makwetu (derde van regs) en die destydse Wes-Kaapse premier Helen Zille het die Mosselbaaise afvaardiging persoonlik geluk gewens en geloof vir die groot prestasie om in die “moeilike” 2016/17 finansiële boekjaar wéér ‘n skoon oudit-verslag te verwerf. Mosselbaai se burgemeester, Harry Levendal, asook die nuwe munisipale bestuurder, Thys Giliomee, (onderskeidelik regs en links van Zille), het trots die trofee en ‘n goue sertifikaat vir uitnemendheid tydens die seremonie in ontvangs geneem. Heel links is Anton Bredell, Wes-Kaapse DA minister van plaaslike regering, omgewingsake en ontwikkelingsbeplanning sedert 2009. Dié skoon oudit-tradisie het egter in die volgende twee jaar skipbreuk gely. 
 
 
Giliomee se kontrak sou op 30 November vanjaar verstryk het.
 
Volgens die uitvoerende burgemeester, Harry Lewendal, was die skikking 'n logiese besluit en die beste oplossing onder die omstandighede.
 
Hy het gesê Giliomee laat 'n stabiele administrasie met 'n uitsonderlike hoë standaard van munisipale dienslewering agter en dat die munisipaliteit sal voortgaan om dié gehalte-dienslewering en toewyding aan inwoners te handhaaf. Hy en die uitvoerende bestuurspan wens hom alle sukses toe in sy toekomstige wedervaringe.
Giliomee het op sy beurt Mosselbaai se raadslede en amptenare geprys as die beste wat enige munisipaliteit kan hoop om te hê. Hy het gesê die onderskeie afdelings wat as 'n eenheid funksioneer, verseker die hoë gehalte munisipale dienslewering waarvoor Mosselbaai Munisipaliteit so dikwels geloof word.
 
Giliomee se voorganger, Dr.Michele Gratz, het destyds eweneens skokgolwe deur die gemeenskap gestuur
toe sy 'n jaar voor die verstryking van haar tweede termyn bedank het weens "onhoudbare politieke inmenging".
 
Michelle Gratz 
 
Gratz, onder wie se tien jaar leierskap Mosselbaai tot ongekende hoogtes in die Wes-Kaap en nasionaal gevoer is, het reeds vroeg in 2016 gewaarsku teen politieke inmenging en die wyse waarop DA-kandidate gekies en aangewys word sonder inagneming van hul ervaring en bevoegdheid. Gratz, 'n gekwalifiseerde mediese dokter, het reeds in Mei 2016 haar voorneme om te bedank bekend gemaak - 'n jaar voordat haar (tweede) termyn amptelik in Mei 2017 sou verstryk. Sy het amptelik uit diens getree op 3 Augustus 2016 om saam te val met die munisipale verkiesing sodat die raad "genoegsame tyd sou hê om die beste en mees geskikte en ervare opvolger te soek."
 
Gratz het hoë aansien in Wes-Kaapse munisipale kringe geniet en onder haar leiding het die Mosselbaai munisipaliteit verskeie "eerstes" bereik en talle provinsiale en nasionale eerbewyse ontvang - waaronder vyf agtereenvolgende skoon oudits, Groen Dorp-toekenning en die feeste soos die Dias-fees wat steeds 'n hoogtepunt op die dorp se toerismekalender is.
 
Ironies genoeg is die aanstelling van Gratz se opvolger toe JUIS gekritseer as 'n eensydige politieke aanstelling wat nie op meriete en ervaring gegrond was nie. Opposisiepartye in die raad het laat blyk dat hulle nie geken is in sy keuring en aanstelling nie en ook nie noodwendig daarmee saamstem nie.
 
ANC-raadslid Jovan Bruinders het gesê Giliomee is deur die DA herontontplooi en nie deur die volle raad aangestel nie. Weens Giliomee se gebrekkige ervaring as munisipale bestuurder sou 'n mentor glo aangestel word om hom aanvanklik by te staan, maar dit het nooit gerealiseer nie.
 
ICOSA-raadslid Dawid Kamfer het destyds selfs sover gegaan om in sy hoedanigheid as provinsiale ICOSA-leier 'n amptelike klag teen Giliomee se aanstelling by die Minister van Samewerkende Regering en Tradisionele Sake, mnr Des van Rooyen, asook die Openbare Beskermer op George aanhangig te maak.
 
 
 Outokratiese en ondeursigtige bestuurstyl
 
* Van die grootste besware teen Giliomee was sy ondeursigtige bestuurstyl om nie op inwoners se vrae en klagtes oor omstrede kwessies te reageer nie en sy nie-amptelike goedkeuring van omstrede ontwikkelingsplanne met uiters nadelige omgewingsimpak wat inwoners dan self tot in hofsake moet gaan beveg.
Voorbeelde hiervan was 'n erg omstrede diepsee-akwamariene-visboerdery met geelstert wat hy kort ná sy aanstelling aangevoor het; 'n erg omstrede vismeel- en olieverwerkingsaanleg op die hawe deur Afro Fishing en tans 'n ewe omstrede fabriek om motorbande en plastiek te herwin (depolymerisasie-aanleg) deur Rooikat Recycling (Pty) Ltd. in Groot-Brakrivier.
 
Inwoners meen as eerste vlak van owerheid het die munisipaliteit 'n verantwoordelikheid en plig teenoor inwoners en belastingbetalers om hulle belange op die hart te dra en hulle te help beskerm teen ontwikkelings wat nie net die omgewing skaad nie, maar ook hul gesondheid en lewensgehalte bedreig. Deur sulke aansoeke goed te keur en net te sê die finale besluit "berus nie" by die munisipaliteit nie, is om dié indirekte plig te versuim.
 
Slagoffers van die Seemeeupark-grondverskuiwingsramp in 2016 en Riverside-inwoners het jare lank vergeefs gepoog om antwoorde van munisipale kant te kry oor hul reuse-verliese en selfs koerantverslaggewers se skriftelike vrae is bloot gesystap of geïgnoreer.
 
seemeeu5 
 
Hangende hofsake van dermiljoene rande waarin die munisipaliteit aanspreeklik gehou is, is onder sy bestuur bloot onder die tafel ingevee terwyl daar deurgaans gefokus is op oppervlakkige beeldpoetsery.
Die feit dat Giliomee die nuusredakteur van die plaaslike gemeenskapskoerant boonop as munisipale woordvoerder aangestel het, het dié klagtes van geheimhouding en ondeursigtigheid versterk.
 
https://www.mosselbayontheline.co.za/index.php/r200-miljoen-skadevergoedingseis-kan-dalk-meer-word-as-winterreen-nuwe-grondverskuiwings-bring
 
 
MEDIA RELEASE: MOSSEL BAY MUNICIPALITY
13 July 2021
 
After extensive negotiations, Mossel Bay Municipality and its Municipal Manager, Adv. Thys Giliomee agreed on the terms to terminate his employment contract on 13 July 2021. This follows the suspension and an investigation into alleged misconduct by the Municipal Manager.
 
Adv. Giliomee joined Mossel Bay Municipality as Municipal Manager on 1 December 2016, and his contract was due to expire on 30 November 2021.
 
The Executive Mayor, Alderman Harry Levendal, stated that the settlement was the logical and best solution in the circumstances.
 
mun sportfees ingelui
 
Adv Giliomee leaves a stable administration with exceptionally high standards of municipal service delivery. Mossel Bay Municipality will maintain these high standards and commitment to service delivery excellence to its residents.
 
The Executive Mayor, the Councillors, and the executive management team of the Mossel Bay Municipality wish Adv Giliomee well in his future endeavours.
 
Adv. Giliomee reiterated that Mossel Bay Municipality has the best Councillors and officials that any municipality may hope for. The functional municipal unit ensures the high standards of municipal service delivery that ensure that accolades are frequently bestowed on Mossel Bay Municipality.
 
Alderman Harry Levendal
Executive Mayor

Mossel Bay Municipality

Related Articles:
 
"Wat het hulle nou eintlik hiermee bereik? Miljoene rande se inkomsteverlies en die vernietiging van nóg 'n gevestigde boot- en seiljagklub met 'n trotse geskiedenis - en dit net om 'n kastige SEB-maatskappytjie met bedenklike credentials te bevoordeel?"
 
Dit was van die  kommentare van omgekrapte lede van die voormalige Mosselbaai Boot- en Seiljagklub nadat dit aan die lig gekom het dat die Transnet Hawe-owerheid (TNPA) uiteindelik regstappe doen om die huurooreenkoms met Mossel Bay Waterfront (PTY) ltd te beëindig. 
 
Dié maatskappy onder eienaarskap van Albe en Verna Durand, waarvan 'n onbekende swart vrou glo die meerderheidsaandele van 52% besit, het glo nog geen huurgeld betaal sedert hulle die huurooreenkoms van die perseel by die Seiljagklub oorgeneem het nie. Die uitstaande huurgeld beloop glo bykans R4 miljoen. 
Dit kom nadat TNPA aan die begin van 2019 die seiljagklub ondanks hewige regsgedinge en 'n hooggeregshof-appélaansoek gedwing het om die perseel te ontruim sodat die Waterfront kan oorneem. 
 
Mossel Bay Yacht Club2
 
Die Mosselbaai Boot- en Seiljagklub het TNPA se besluit tot in die hoogste hof beveg, maar moes in 2019 die aftog blaas toe die appélhof ook bevind het die huurooreenkoms met Mossel Bay Waterfront is geldig. 
 
Die Durands se bestuurstyl en geesdriftige planne om die perseel in 'n meer inklusiewe toeriste-aantreklikheid te omskep met 'n spog-restaurant en groot buitelug-dek, asook vlooimark-stalletjies en vermaak, het van die begin af die wenkbroue laat lig. Die amptelike opening van die restaurant is 'n paar keer uitgestel en die seiljagklublede het geweier om as betalende lede onder die Waterfront-vaandel aan te sluit. 
 
Die jongste verwikkelinge bring 'n einde aan 'n vyf jaar lange vete, maar die toekoms van die perseel en die seiljagklub bly onseker. Die regstappe om die Waterfront te ontruim kan 'n geruime tyd duur en selfs al sou 'n nuwe huurooreenkoms met die seiljagklub aangegaan word, sal dit lank neem om die skade te herstel. 
 
Lees ook die artikel in die Moneyweb hieroor: 
 
Did greed kill the yacht club? 
 
Transnet eventually makes a move against non-paying tenant after losing R3.6m in rent. 
By Adriaan Kruger 7 June 2021
 
The ongoing tale of woe at the former premises of the Mossel Bay Yacht and Boat Club (MBYBC) has entered a new stage.
 
Two and a half years after the Transnet National Ports Authority (TNPA) evicted MBYBC and awarded a rental contract for the property to a small private company, the authorities have started the legal process to evict the new operators.
 
It came to light that the new occupant, Mossel Bay Waterfront (Pty) Ltd, has not paid any rent, nor did it bother to pay the initial deposit.
 
Despite TPNA neglecting to collect the deposit of more than R1 million from Waterfront at the beginning of the rental period, it apparently allowed the tenant to occupy the premises. Waterfront has been squatting there since February 2019.
 
This was disclosed in an email sent to Moneyweb by a whistleblower, who attached a statement of all transactions to the end of August 2020. At that date, the outstanding balance exceeded R2.4 million.
 
That it took TNPA more than two years to take corrective action stands in stark contrast to the quick and severe action Transnet management and its legal team took to evict the yacht club.
A thick pile of court documents shows the lengths to which TNPA has gone to ensure that the premises went to Waterfront.
 
MBYBC argues in court documents (asking for a review of the process when Waterfront got the contract) that the yacht club has been paying its rent every month for more than 60 years. When TNPA refused to extend the club’s rental agreement, the rent amounted to more than R108 000 per month.
 
It seems like easy money to earn, but TNPA elected to call for tenders and picked a bad contender.
 
History
 
MBYBC members were surprised when a tender for a new lease agreement in 2016 was awarded to the newly-formed private company.
 
The yacht club had had a rental agreement with the port authorities since its formation in 1956, and all the buildings and facilities were built by members at their own cost over the years.
 
The then South African Railways & Harbours Administration offered 15- and 20-year rent contracts and charged nominal rent, as responsible governments do to support beneficial activities like sporting bodies.
 
The rent increased slowly over the years, and then sharply after Railways & Harbours morphed into Portnet.
 
According to a newsletter sent to members towards the end of 2018: “When the last long-term lease ended in 2004, the club was given only a 5-year lease and the rental for the premises increased drastically from R17 000 per year to R17 000 per month. This amount has now escalated to R74 000 per month for the club’s premises, excluding the mooring rental fee of R35 000 per month.”
 
By then, in late 2018, the club was embroiled in a three-year legal battle to try to hold on to the property in which members have invested maybe millions over the years.
 
Surprise
 
The surprise came when TPNA announced the result of the tender in 2016. In short, MBYBC added the normal 10% escalation to its existing rent to its bid, offering to pay rent of just less than R118 000 per month.
 
The club’s committee probably thought it was good enough for a property that the club could argue ‘belonged’ to them, seeing that all the buildings and improvements were paid for by members. A history of the club notes that the club started off on nothing more than a rocky shore and built everything itself.
 
These improvements included not only the large clubhouse, bathrooms, storage space for equipment, and reclaiming land from the sea to build a new pier and slipway, but also R1 million spent on a floating dock inside the harbour that contained 50 convenient walk-on moorings.
 
Unfortunately, the unknown Waterfront tendered R200 per month more and won the tender.
 
TPNA has subsequently lost out on more R3.6 million in rent since evicting MBYBC (based on a 10% escalation). This is a small amount in comparison to Transnet’s annual fruitless and wasteful expenditure of billions, or taxpayers’ continued support to the tune of billions.
 
Read: Transnet still suffers from state capture’s harmful impact (Oct 2019)
 
Mossel Bay Waterfront
 
Waterfront belongs to Verna Durand, the wife of a former member of the yacht club.
 
Durand convinced TNPA that the company was largely black-owned and committed to transforming the yacht club’s overwhelming white membership.
 
MBYBC called for a review of the tender, arguing in court documents during the review and subsequent appeals that Waterfront failed to comply with most of the tender conditions. The most compelling argument was that Waterfront could not prove that it would be able to pay the rent.
 
Waterfront did not submit three years’ worth of audited financial statements as required by the tender conditions, its tax affairs were unknown, and it could not provide any guarantee or surety that rent would be paid.
 
‘Fair’ process
 
Durand countered that members would support a new club and that membership fees would cover the rent.
 
TPNA submitted to court that it is nonsensical to expect a new, female-owned company with largely black shareholders to submit three years’ worth of financial records.
 
The courts, all the way to the Cape Town High Court and the Supreme Court of Appeal, ruled against MBYBC by saying that the process was fair.
 
MBYBC’s pleadings that it was a non-profitable organisation in good financial standing fell on deaf ears and the club was finally evicted at the beginning of 2019.
 
Meanwhile, TPNA and the courts failed to pick up that Waterfront didn’t have any black shareholders.
 
The Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) database show Durand as the only director and only shareholder of Waterfront in its initial registration.
 
More telling about the standing of Waterfront is that it never submitted any of the required returns after the initial registration.
 
Durand did not respond to questions about its black economic empowerment (BEE) standing.
 
Sailing came to a halt
 
Yacht club members didn’t take kindly to the hijacking of their club and most of the 700 MBYBC members refused to join the new club under the umbrella of Waterfront.
 
Neither Durand nor any official of Mossel Bay Waterfront responded to queries about the club and its membership. It is unclear if the new club was formally founded.
 
The Waterfront website and Facebook page do not mention a club committee, election of office bearers, member meetings or a constitution – as one would normally expect when looking at sporting bodies.
 
After nearly three years, the website contains mostly lorem ipsum text (meaningless placeholder or dummy text to fill a space in DIY website templates) and the Facebook page largely advertises food, drink and rock bands.
 
The Waterfront club is also not affiliated to SA Sailing, the controlling body of sailing in SA that ensures safety standards and regulates sailing.
 
National and international sailing events were cancelled and the development sailing initiative at the club came to a halt.
 
Some owners of larger boats moved to other yacht clubs, while most refused to accept a new rental agreement for their moorings. Boat owners had previously paid a refundable capital contribution to MBYBC to secure a mooring and paid around R600 per month in rental.
 
Durand said these rights lapsed and demanded R2 200 annual membership fees for membership of the new “club” and monthly rental of R1 800 per month for a mooring.
 
Uncertain outlook
 
The future for the MBYBC, the yacht club without a home, remains uncertain.
 
Evicting Durand might take a long time, and there is no guarantee that TNPA will do the right thing next time around.
 
TPNA responded to questions with a terse email, saying that legal processes are under way to deal with the situation: “… as matters related to the contract are both confidential and sub judice, we will not be commenting publicly and request that the media allow the legal process currently under way to take its course.”
 
It will take decades to undo the damage, with members pointing out that the situation is not unique to Mossel Bay. Several yacht clubs have failed in recent years, or have been changed to drinking and dancing venues.
Related Articles: