Top Up Service Station Beach House Restaurant Reflexions Professional Hair Oyster World Wolwedans Game Farm Skorpios Security Ponto Grille and Carvery Delfinos.Passion for food-Passion for life Property Pointer

 

MosselbayonTheline | First With The News

“Stephan must simply stick to his story. The man with the most money will win the case.”

 These were among the strange words and behaviour of Dr Lawton Vosloo of Jeffreys Bay two days after the deaths of his son and his son’s fiancée in the controversial Kareedouw murder case. The Hoon family say these remarks prompted them, already after the joint funeral service, to seek the assistance of renowned private investigator Mike Bolhuis. When it became clear that Bolhuis’s services would be too expensive, they appointed another private investigator, Leon Rossouw, to allay their fears and attempt to find answers to troubling questions.
These revelations by the traumatised Hoon family come a week after sentencing in the contentious case in which the well-known Kareedouw farmer, Kevin Pretorius (53), was sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment without bail for the alleged “gassing death” of Jéan Vosloo (25) and Mari Hoon (28) in the shower of the popular Kouga Kliphuis on Pretorius’s family farm, Zuuranys.
 
Mari Hoon en Jéan Vosloo mooie                                                    Mari Hoon and Jéan Vosloo
 
Pretorius’s neighbour’s son, Stephan du Plessis (now 30), discovered the couple in the shower on the Sunday morning after he had invited them, with Pretorius’s permission, to come and braai and relax there free of charge, even though the Kliphuis was officially closed to guests during the Covid-19 lockdown. Pretorius has been held in the high-security St Albans prison since last Friday while awaiting a court date for his new legal team’s appeals against the conviction and sentence.
Stephan du Plessis           Stephan du Plessis Kevin mooi  Kevin Pretorius
 
Sakkie (66) and Maria (61) Hoon and their two daughters, Michelle (40) and Suné (36), have for five years carried a double burden of disturbing questions and uncertainties surrounding the strange death of their beloved youngest daughter and sister.
 
                             The Hoon family fltr are Michelle, Sakkie, Suné, Maria and Mari
 
 Since the rapid cremation and joint funeral service on 2 May 2020, arranged by Dr Vosloo and his wife Christel in Jeffreys Bay, they have been trying to get someone in authority to pay attention to their questions and objections. This follows allegations that the Vosloo couple had already removed all the couple’s clothing and belongings on the same day the bodies were found in the shower on Sunday morning, 26 April 2020. Some of the clothing was also washed by the Vosloos, and reddish-brown stains on Mari’s jersey that they claimed they could not remove were dismissed as red wine stains.
 
Dr Vosloo allegedly also declared the couple dead at the scene himself and has since played a leading role in all aspects of the police and post-mortem investigations, the autopsy, cremation and joint funeral service — all of which were completed within a week.
 
Lawton en Christel Vosloo                                                                        Dr Lawton and Christel Vosloo
 
When Suné and her husband Rudi went to the Vosloos’ home in Jeffreys Bay the afternoon after the funeral service and insisted on getting Mari’s cellphone back — which the Vosloos had earlier refused to return with her other belongings — they were allegedly told the phone could not be returned because the police needed it. Suné then suggested that they meet the Vosloos the following day at the Kareedouw police station where she would hand in Mari’s phone if the Vosloos would also submit Jéan’s phone. This apparently caused the Vosloos to change their minds.
“If there is anything on this phone that contributed to my son’s death, I will sue you and your entire family.”
Dr Lawton Vosloo allegedly closed the front door and left them outside while he went to fetch the phone in the house. The phone was fully charged and sealed in a zip-lock bag when he angrily handed it to her with those words. Suné says she was so taken aback that she replied: “But if they died of carbon monoxide poisoning, how could something on the phone have caused their death?” Vosloo allegedly responded only: “No, no — I’m just saying.”
The Hoon family were so traumatised by the strange circumstances in which the couple died, the inadequate police investigation — in which no cellphone analyses or proper cross-examinations were conducted — and the swift cremation, that they all lost their jobs and at one stage lived and worked together on a farm.
 
What particularly continues to haunt the two Hoon sisters is the scene in the mortuary in Jeffreys Bay. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic there was a massive backlog with autopsies and the waiting list was reportedly three to five weeks. Thanks to Dr Vosloo’s influence they apparently managed to move quickly at the Jeffreys Bay mortuary.
 
When the Hoon sisters had to rush Mari’s favourite clothes there on 29 April 2020 and insisted on doing her make-up themselves for their final farewell, Mari was reportedly deathly pale compared to Jéan’s purplish-red colouring. There was also allegedly a deep dark indentation on the right side of her skull, blood on her left ear and a wide white plaster around her neck.
When they asked the undertaker about this, he allegedly said it was due to the autopsy. When asked why Jéan did not have similar marks or a plaster on his neck, they were allegedly told it was “because he received a different type of autopsy”.
 
Rossouw, the private investigator who has since reportedly disappeared, said when approached that he could not obtain access at the time to the original police photographs and court records, even though he worked through an attorney as is customary. Both he and the Hoons personally contacted the state prosecutor, Johan Jansen, to pass on new information, but he allegedly said he was not interested and did not work with private investigators.
According to Rossouw, he later also brought WhatsApp messages between Mari Hoon and a friend in Pretoria to the attention of Kevin’s attorney, Alwyn Griebenow, to confirm contradictions in the state’s timeline. Griebenow was supposed to call him back later, but apparently never did.
 
Kevin hof7     State prosecutor Johan Jansen Alwyn Griebenow           Original defence attorney Alwyn Griebenow
 
The Hoon sisters both spoke publicly in recent weeks in separate interviews after the involvement of forensic expert Dr David Klatzow and the appointment of a new Cape Town legal team led by Advocate Francois van Zyl.
Suné said in candid discussions that the Hoon family had suspected from the beginning that something was wrong and had searched for answers, but because of limited funds they could not conduct further investigations themselves.
 
“Dr Lawton’s strange words and behaviour so soon after their deaths, and Stephan’s testimony that he knows nothing about what happened that night, were very strange and disturbing to us. Also the extremely rapid autopsies, cremation and funeral within a week before any investigation had been conducted or before we could even begin to process our grief and properly say goodbye to Mari.”
They had wanted Bolhuis or a private investigator to examine the original autopsy reports and check the cellphone records of Stephan and Jéan, but when Rossouw achieved nothing and did not return to them, they no longer knew what to do.
 
“Even when the state prosecutor showed no interest in following up our information, we were astonished. But these things still eat away at our family like a cancer and prevent us from finding closure,” she said.
 
Michelle Hoon and her husband Niel also revealed in an interview with Dr David Klatzow that the couple were not as happy as media rumours had suggested and that Jéan was extremely possessive and jealous. He allegedly often took Mari’s phone and confronted her aggressively. Michelle also confirmed the remarks Dr Lawton Vosloo had made at the time in the presence of witnesses in a signed statement.
 
Hoon_verklaring_sonder_ID.jpg
 
At Kevin Pretorius’s very first court appearance — when he was suddenly formally charged with double murder — Mari’s mother Maria specifically informed the state prosecutor Johan Jansen about the questions and irregularities troubling them. She also told him about a disturbing late-night WhatsApp conversation Mari had on the night in question with a family friend in Pretoria.
This nearly hour-long conversation from 22:29 to 23:19, in which Mari apparently wanted to reveal “serious matters”, contradicted Stephan’s testimony that Jéan and Mari had gone to shower at about 20:30 and 21:00 respectively and were supposedly overcome by carbon monoxide. Jansen reportedly said they could not introduce that information because it would harm the state’s case.
 
 
https://www.weskusontheline.co.za/2025/10/22/kliphouse-tragedy-to-claim-another-innocent-victim-due-to-media-driven-need-for-revenge/
 
Suné said: “When our family arrived in Jeffreys Bay on 28 April, all of Mari’s clothes and belongings had already been removed from the cottage on the Kenmore farm where Mari and Jéan had lived together and were neatly stored in the Vosloos’ garage.”
The couple and several other young people lived and worked on the Kenmore farm of Grasslands Agriculture about 37 km outside Kareedouw.
“Aunt Christel (Vosloo) gave us Mari’s weekend and make-up bags, as well as the clothes she had worn at the Kliphuis. She cried and said she wanted to return the clothes clean. She said she could not remove the reddish-brown stains on the jersey where Mari had probably spilled red wine on herself. She also gave us Mari’s earrings, but not her engagement ring or cellphone. When my mother asked about it, she said Jéan had worked hard and paid a lot for it and she had decided to keep it herself because they were not yet married.”
“It was extremely upsetting for our parents that they could not pack Mari’s belongings themselves in the places where she had lived and spent her final night. My parents then went with Aunt Christel into their home on the Kenmore farm while Michelle, her husband Niel and I stood outside with Dr Vosloo waiting. It was then that Dr Vosloo suddenly said: ‘Stephan must just stick to his story. The man with the most money will win the case.’”
“We were stunned, because it was only two days after their deaths and there had been no talk of a court case yet as everyone still saw it as a tragic freak accident.”
 
Other aspects troubling the Hoons are that Mari allegedly still had her earrings in when the couple were found naked in the shower. According to the sisters it had always been a family tradition never to shower or sleep wearing earrings or jewellery.
 
When the Hoons first visited the Kouga Kliphuis on 1 May 2020, there was no sign of a cordoned-off crime scene. There were splashes and stains that looked like blood near the steps of the braai area, and when Stephan was asked about it he allegedly said it was sauce and juice from the boerewors they had braaied on the Saturday night. Other similar splashes that were photographed in a bedroom and in the shower were apparently never questioned or investigated. Neither were strange finger and drag marks on the inside windows of one of the bedrooms.
 
 
The Hoons are struggling to find closure while so many unanswered questions continue to trouble them.
“We felt sorry for Pretorius from the beginning because we believed he would never deliberately cause anyone’s death, but we also wanted answers and justice. When all the evidence against him began emerging in court without counter-evidence from his legal team, we started believing that he must be guilty, even though all the other issues still troubled us.
 
“It was only when all the questions we have struggled with from the beginning began appearing in the media and Dr Klatzow confirmed everything that we regained the courage to fight for the full truth about what really happened that night. We are not hateful and do not seek revenge — we only want the full truth to come out so that we can understand, justice can be done and we can find closure.”
 
 
Two families mourning a beloved child, brother and sister. The Vosloo family (left) believe a beloved Kareedouw farmer must pay with imprisonment for their son’s death so that they can find closure; the Hoon family believe the full truth must first emerge before they will truly be able to make peace with the death of their beloved daughter and sister.
 
Vosloo gesinHoon gesin1 600x400
 
While the controversial and exhausting court case continues after five years, family and friends of Kevin — who have visited the Kouga Kliphuis for years — helped in December 2025 to clean and renovate the building and surroundings after it had stood empty for so long. The hundreds of people who have spent wonderful times there over the past 25 years remain firmly behind him in proving his innocence.
A crowdfunding campaign has meanwhile been launched to raise funds for his legal costs:
 
 
Also read the Afrikaans version here: 
 
https://www.weskusontheline.co.za/2026/03/02/agter-die-skerms-van-die-kareedouw-tragedie-hoon-sussies-maak-hart-skoon/
 
 
 
Kevin kinders in STORTInnocent photo of children washing and playing in the Kouga Kliphuis shower in December 2025 - long after the tragedy. Photo with permission of parents
Related Articles:
 
THEY ARE GROWING THE COVID-19 VIRUS IN SOUTH AFRICA
 
"Listen to the clip below. From the 38th minute, a W.H.O. Doctor says more than twice that South Africa is "growing the Covid virus" and is testing if it can mutate. She then goes on to say that they as W.H.O are watching what South Africa is busy doing "with interest".
Why has Cyril never disclosed this to South Africans? Why was our government playing with such fire? South Africa can't run one power station successfully, but it plays with our lives by agreeing to "grow the virus and test if it can mutate" on our South African soil?
That is why Cyril was crying, the burden of what he and his government has exposed us to is unforgivable."
- Vytjie Mentor 
 
4 years ago I warned that President Cyril Ramaphosa would be the most dangerous president South Africa has ever had. People laughed. In 2018 President Ramaphosa said he would forge a New World Order. People then voted for him and his satanic globalist agenda. Now that Ramaphosa is doing exactly what he said, people are complaining. The evil, deaths and devastation we have experienced in our country is only the beginning. What is happening is part of the NWO depopulation agenda - it's not about saving lives, it's about controlling and destroying lives.
 
Covid-19 was used as a political tool by the elite, satanists, liberals, communists, globalist leaders and corrupt politicians to usher in the New World Order. The blood of many people will be on their hands.
 
May the Lord help us. Our hope and trust is in God, not in a wicked government.
 
Esther Meshoe
 

https://youtu.be/U15sSanhJaM

Streamed live on Dec 28, 2020

 May be an image of text

 Next lockdown in SA predicted to start on 2 December 2021 - to kill the economy effectively? 

Dr. Susan Vosloo, one of South Africa's most renowned Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons and a good friend of the late prof. Chris Barnard, has been speaking up against the draconic Covid lockdown and treatment protocols since March 2020, but she and thousands of SA like-minded medical experts have been ignored, ridiculed and discredited by the same SA mainstream media that used to quote them regularly as experts on health issues. 

Read her Covid diary that was published on 5 August 2020: 

"As this is written, still unable to travel, Malta's sunshine is sorely missed. It's mid-winter in the Southern hemisphere. Facing consequences of strategies applied to the novel Covid-19 pandemic, we drift on a tragic trajectory worldwide, particularly in Africa.

"One wonders: Are the 'blind' leading the sheeple? The only thing worse than being blind, is having sight, but no vision?"

Dr Susan Vosloo and family

Dr. Susan Vosloo with anesthetist husband Anton and their twin daughters (Photo: Marie Benoit)

https://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2020-08-05/newspaper-lifestyleculture/Marie-Benoit-s-Diary-Corona-Chronicles-Covid-19-in-2020-An-African-perspective-6736225831

Covid-19 vaccines – the raging debate after Dr Susan Vosloo’s controversial video

https://www.biznews.com/undictated/2021/08/17/covid-19-vaccines-vosloo

No photo description available.

YET, literally TENS of THOUSANDS of experienced and renowned top medical experts in SA and across the world are confirming Dr. Vosloo's views and have been trying non-stop to get their serious messages and warnings to the public despite the worst media censorship in history. 

1. Dr. Nancy Banks -
2. Dr. Russell Blaylock -
3. Dr. Shiv Chopra -
4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny -
5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries - http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
6. Dr. Larry Palevsky - http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
7. Dr. Toni Bark - http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield - http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo
9. Dr. Meryl Nass - http://bit.ly/1DGzJsc
10. Dr. Raymond Obomsawin - http://bit.ly/1G9ZXYl
11. Dr. Ghislaine Lanctot - http://bit.ly/1MrVeUL
12. Dr. Robert Rowen - http://bit.ly/1SIELeF
13. Dr. David Ayoub - http://bit.ly/1SIELve
14. Dr. Boyd Haley PhD - http://bit.ly/1KsdVby
15. Dr. Rashid Buttar - http://bit.ly/1gWOkL6
16. Dr. Roby Mitchell - http://bit.ly/1gdgEZU
17. Dr. Ken Stoller - http://bit.ly/1MPVqLI
18. Dr. Mayer Eisenstein - http://bit.ly/1LLEqHH
19. Dr. Frank Engley, PhD - http://bit.ly/1OHbLDI
20. Dr. David Davis - http://bit.ly/1gdgJwo
21. Dr Tetyana Obukhanych - http://bit.ly/16Z7k6J
22. Dr. Harold E Buttram - http://bit.ly/1Kru6Df
23. Dr. Kelly Brogan - http://bit.ly/1D31pfQ
24. Dr. RC Tent - http://bit.ly/1MPVwmu
25. Dr. Rebecca Carley - http://bit.ly/K49F4d
26. Dr. Andrew Moulden - http://bit.ly/1fwzKJu
27. Dr. Jack Wolfson - http://bit.ly/1wtPHRA
28. Dr. Michael Elice - http://bit.ly/1KsdpKA
29. Dr. Terry Wahls - http://bit.ly/1gWOBhd
30. Dr. Stephanie Seneff - http://bit.ly/1OtWxAY
31. Dr. Paul Thomas - http://bit.ly/1DpeXPf
32. Many doctors talking at once - http://bit.ly/1MPVHOv
33. Dr. Richard Moskowitz - censored
34. Dr. Jane Orient - http://bit.ly/1MXX7pb
35. Dr. Richard Deth - http://bit.ly/1GQDL10
36. Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic - http://bit.ly/1eqiPr5
37. Dr Chris Shaw - http://bit.ly/1IlGiBp
38. Dr. Susan McCreadie - http://bit.ly/1CqqN83
39. Dr. Mary Ann Block - http://bit.ly/1OHcyUX
40. Dr. David Brownstein - http://bit.ly/1EaHl9A
41. Dr. Jayne Donegan - http://bit.ly/1wOk4Zz
42. Dr. Troy Ross - censored 
43. Dr. Philip Incao - http://bit.ly/1ghE7sS
44. Dr. Joseph Mercola - http://bit.ly/18dE38I
45. Dr. Jeff Bradstreet - http://bit.ly/1MaX0cC
46. Dr. Robert Mendelson - http://bit.ly/1JpAEQr
 
More doctors testifying that vaccines aren't safe or effective, in these documentaries. WHY are their warnings and concerns ignored by the mainstream media?  
 
1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic - http://bit.ly/1vvQJ2W
2. The Greater Good - http://bit.ly/1icxh8j
3. Shots In The Dark - http://bit.ly/1ObtC8h
4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth - http://bit.ly/KEYDUh
5. Vaccine Nation - http://bit.ly/1iKNvpU
6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines - http://bit.ly/1vlpwvU
7. Lethal Injection - http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ
9. Deadly Immunity -
10. Autism - Made in the USA - http://bit.ly/1J8WQN5
11. Beyond Treason - http://bit.ly/1B7kmvt
12. Trace Amounts - http://bit.ly/1vAH3Hv
13. Why We Don't Vaccinate -
 
9 hour court case
 
Documentaries...  
 
 1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic(2013)
 
 
2. The Greater Good - (2011)
 
 
3. Shots In The Dark -(2009)
 
 
4. Vaccination The Hidden Truth -(1998)
 
 
5. Vaccine Nation - (2008)
 
 
6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines -
 
 
7. Lethal Injection - http://bit.ly/1URN7BJ
 
8. Bought - (2015)
 
 
9. Deadly Immunity - (2005)
 
 
10. Autism - Made in the USA(2009)
 
 

11. Beyond Treason - (2005)

 

 

Related Articles:

 Maren de Klerk

‘Use me as a state witness’: De Klerk spills beans
 
18 January 2021 | Crime
Mathias Haufiku
WINDHOEK
 
In an affidavit leaked last week, lawyer Marén de Klerk opened up on how the Fishrot scandal was plotted and pleaded with the prosecution to make him a state witness.
 
De Klerk narrated how he met key players in the corruption and bribery scandal and denied claims that he masterminded the scheme in which he played a key role.
He also claimed there were other lawyers used to facilitate the transfer of funds “under a clandestine shield of attorneys’ trust accounts”.
 
De Klerk, who in the past served on the ethics committee of the Law Society of Namibia, also accused the SA economist and fishing boss Adriaan Louw from African Selection Trust (AST) of devising the creation of Seaflower Pelagic Processing (SPP) along with former justice minister Sacky Shanghala and James Hatuikulipi.
Louw, who is also the chairperson of SPP, denied having any involvement in the corruption masterplan, but also did not position De Klerk as the scheme’s paymaster.
 
fishrot Adriaan Jacobus Louw1 2
 
AJ Louw 
 
“I did not take a single cent from anybody,” Louw told Namibian Sun’s sister publication, Republikein.
AST owns 60% of the shares in SPP, while the remaining 40% belong to Fishcor.
 
Swapo ‘boys’ club’
 
De Klerk indicated that he did not hesitate to go into business with Shanghala because he would “become closer to the Swapo boys’ club”, which would boost his financial development.
 
He mentioned that his company, Celax Investments, was used to fund Swapo’s election campaign.
He added that Shanghala and Hatuikulipi told him that President Hage Geingob mandated them to set up a structure to deal with the management and distributions paid to Swapo by supporters.
The structure would allegedly be used to administer and distribute the contributions, he said.
 
“Shanghala informed me that the boss had appointed Hatuikulipi as his economic advisor to design a bespoke structure to manage and to distribute these contributions,” De Klerk revealed.
The proposed title for the structure was Ndilimani - the name of Swapo’s music group.
 
Stolen funds
 
De Klerk also indicated that he chose not to raise concerns with Shanghala and Hatuikulipi as he feared it would jeopardise his relationship with them, which could result in him forfeiting lucrative financial opportunities.
He claimed that he did not know that the money Celax received was “stolen funds”.
Celax, according to De Klerk, was used to pay money to Swapo leaders, Ndilimani Cultural Troupe and service providers who did work for Swapo.
Swapo has since last year consistently denied benefitting from the Fishrot scandal.
 
De Klerk said he earned around N$4 million in fees from the time he was appointed as director of SPP.
He added that DHC Incorporated was instructed by the authorities to ringfence all remaining funds held for Swapo, Shanghala and Hatuikulipi. This amounts to N$4.8 million.
 
Keeping mum
 
Swapo has come under fire again at fresh allegations that it had improperly benefitted from proceeds made dubiously by public entity Fishcor.
Upon enquiry, presidential spokesperson Alfredo Hengari said the case has now reached a sensitive stage as the Prosecutor-General has taken a decision.
 
“The president has in the past addressed and denied the most unfair and unfortunate allegations and insinuations being made against him in the matter you are referring to. The president maintains his position in this respect,” Hengari said.
 
“The president will not seek to jeopardise or influence the administration of justice through public statements induced by the media. The president will, when trial-related rules and ethics allow and at an appropriate time, extensively address the unfortunate insinuations, conjecture and mischievous interpretations, with a view to demonstrate their falsity.”
 
 
'Gebruik my as getuie'
Marén de Klerk: 'Ek het nie geweet dit is gesteelde geld'
 
18 January 2021 | Misdaad
Mathias Haufiku en Ronelle Rademeyer
 
Dié verklaring het hy verlede jaar uit Suid-Afrika aan die Teenkorrupsie-kommissie (ACC) voorgelê.
 
De Klerk vertel in fyn besonderhede hoe hy met die sleutelspelers in die Fishrot-sage ontmoet het, maar ontken in sy verklaring dat hy dié bedrog- en korrupsieskema waarin hy 'n belangrike rol gespeel het, uitgedink het.
Hy voer aan daar is ander prokureurs gebruik om betalings “onder die klandestiene dekmantel van hul trustrekenings” te maak.
 
De Klerk, wat in die verlede al op die etiekkomitee van die Prokureursorde van Namibië gedien het, beskuldig die vismagnaat, mnr. AJ (Adriaan) Louw, dat hy die skepping van Seaflower Pelagic Processing (SPP) saam met die destydse justisieminister, mnr. Sacky Shanghala, en die gewese voorsitter van die National Fishing Corporation of Namibia (Fishcor), James Hatuikulipi, uitgedink het.
 
Louw is die hoof uitvoerende beampte van African Selection Trust SA Group (AST), wat 60% van die aandele in SPP besit. Die ander 40% behoort aan Fishcor.
 
Louw het gister by navraag opnuut ontken dat hy enige aandeel in die beweerde sameswering gehad het.
“Ek het nie een sent van iemand gevat nie,” sê hy. Hy voer ook aan hy het Shanghala eers ontmoet nadat SPP klaar gestig was.
 
“Ons (AST) het op die toneel gekom toe die tafel klaar gedek was en drie ander voor ons nie wou aansit nie. Ons het die geld en die kennis gebring en die fabriek gebou. Ons het N$790 miljoen belê. En daarna is ons met niks anders as minagting behandel,” sê hy oor die ooreenkoms ingevolge waarvan SPP vanaf 2018 jaarliks 50 000 ton se maasbankerkwota sou kry.
 
“Hulle (Fishcor) was oorstelp van vreugde dat daar eindelik iemand is wat bereid was om geld op die tafel te sit om die verwerkingsaanleg te bou,” sê hy, en voeg by drie ander beleggers is voor hom genader.
 
SWAPO se 'MANNEKLUB'
 
De Klerk sê in sy verklaring hy het nie gehuiwer om met Shanghala besigheid te doen nie, want hy “wou nader aan Swapo se 'manneklub' kom” omdat dit sy finansiële vooruitsigte kon verbeter het.
 
Hy sê verder die maatskappy Celax Investments One is gebruik om betalings vir die finansiering van Swapo se 2019-verkiesingsveldtog te maak.
Volgens hom het Shangala en Hatuikulipi aan hom gesê pres. Hage Geingob het aan hulle opdrag gegee om 'n struktuur te vestig vir die bestuur en verspreiding van geld wat deur ondersteuners aan Swapo betaal is.
 
“Shanghala het vir my gesê die Baas het Hatuikulipi aangestel as sy ekonomiese raadgewer om 'n pasgemaakte struktuur te ontwerp om hierdie bydraes te bestuur en te versprei,” lui sy verklaring.
 
De Klerk sê hy het besluit om nie sy kommer hieroor met Shanghala en Hatuikulipi te deel nie uit vrees dat dit sy verhouding met hulle, wat vir hom tot winsgewende finansiële geleenthede kon lei, sou versuur.
Hy voer aan hy het nie geweet die geld wat aan Celax Investments One oorbetaal is, was “gesteelde geld” nie.
Celax Investments One, sê De Klerk, is gebruik om geld aan leiers in die Swapo-struktuur, die Ndilimani-kultuurgroep en diensverskaffers van die party te betaal. Swapo het sedert die bom oor Fishrot gebars het, ontken dat hy by dié vermeende bedrogspul met viskwotas gebaat het.
 
Louw hou vol hy was onbewus daarvan dat Celax Investments One, wat deur AST gestig is met die doel om in die toekoms aandele aan swart ekonomiese bemagtigingsvennote toe te ken, deur De Klerk gebruik is om sowat N$75,6 miljoen te was.
 
“Die doel van Celax was om 33 persent van die aandele in Seaflower te 'parkeer' vir wanneer die NEEEF-wetgewing (Nuwe Raamwerk vir Gelyke Ekonomiese Bemagtiging) van krag word,” verduidelik Louw.
 
Celax is op 24 Januarie 2017 met De Klerk as enigste aandeelhouer geregistreer. Dít blyk uit 'n forensiese ondersoek wat deur ProNam Forensic Services in opdrag van AST gedoen is en waarvan afskrifte verlede jaar aan die media, asook aan mnr. Leon Jooste, minister van staatsondernemings, en dr. Albert Kawana, minister van visserye en mariene hulpbronne, gegee is.
“Marén moes elke jaar 'n beëdigde verklaring onderteken dat hy Celax dormant sou hou,” sê Louw. Hy sê dit is vir hom duidelik uit De Klerk se gelekte eedsverklaring dat die kwota wat kontraktueel na SPP moes gaan, deur hulle (Hatuikulipi en kie.) gesteel is.
 
“Ek sal na die ACC toe moet gaan en sê hulle het ons kwota gesteel. Die ander ding wat duidelik is uit Marén se verklaring, is dat hy die privilegie wat tussen 'n prokureur en sy kliënt bestaan, verbreek het. Ons (SPP) sal 'n klag by die Prokureursorde (Law Society of Namibia) moet indien,” het Louw verder gesê.
 
Volgens De Klerk het hy sowat N$4 miljoen se fooie verdien vandat hy in 2017 as 'n direkteur van SPP aangestel is.
Hy het saam met Louw, Hatuikulipi, asook mnre. Johan Breed (finansiële direkteur van AST) en Mike Nghipunya, hoof uitvoerende beampte van Fishcor, in dié vismaat­skappy se direksie gedien.
De Klerk was tot vroeg in Januarie 2020 ook Seaflower se prokureur.
 
Fishrot Johannes Augustinus Breed cropped 2
 
Johannes Augustinus Breed is ook een van die direkteure van die omstrede Afro Fishing in Mosselbaai 
 
Hy sê sy prokureursfirma, DHC Incorporated, is verlede jaar deur die owerhede beveel om Swapo, Hatuikulipi en Shanghala se geld wat nog in die trustrekening was, van die res van die geld in die rekening te skei.
 
PRES. GEINGOB
 
Intussen het die presidensiële woordvoerder, dr. Alfredo Hengari, by navraag gesê die saak het 'n sensitiewe punt bereik, want die aanklaer-generaal, me. Martha Imalwa, moet 'n beslissing maak.
 
“Die president het in die verlede al gepraat oor dié uiters onregverdige en ongelukkige bewerings en insinuasies teen hom in die saak waarna u verwys. Die president handhaaf sy standpunt in hierdie verband,” was Hengari se reaksie.
 
“Die president wil nie die regspleging in gevaar stel of beïnvloed deur openbare uitsprake in die media nie. Die president sal, wanneer regsreëls en etiek dit toelaat en op 'n gepaste tydstip, die ongelukkige insinuasies, vermoedens en interpretasies breedvoerig bespreek met die oog daarop om die valsheid daarvan te ontbloot,” het hy gesê.
 
'n WhatsApp-stemnavraag gister aan De Klerk oor sy gelekte verklaring, het onbeantwoord gebly. Dit is wel ontvang en daar is na die stemboodskap geluister.

De Klerk bevind hom waarskynlik steeds in die Wes-Kaap. Hy het 'n strandhuis aan dié provinsie se westelike kus.

 http://mosselbayontheline.co.za/index.php/maren-de-klerk-fishrot-affidavit

http://mosselbayontheline.co.za/images/pdf/Affidavit_Maren_de_Klerk_17.04.2020.pdf

Related Articles:
 
The traditional printed media is increasingly fighting a losing battle to survive the tsunami of mass media flooding every possible communication circuit, spurred by hungry, hasty masses who want to say, see and hear it ALL - NOW!
 
media2
 
Social media has an unstoppable life of its own and seconds after a major catastrophe or calamity occurred, the tweets, twitters, twats and Facebook/Instagram photos start pouring in with detailed graphic descriptions and footage . . . 
 
No traditional media outlet can compete with the technology freely available to anyone with moderate knowledge of the latest cellphone apps and gadgets. While social media has many advantages and even life-saving benefits, the freedom of speech it offers to every Tom, Dick and Harry is taking its toll.
 
Fake news, slander and internet fraud have become part of our daily lives and the trick to distinguish between truth, trash or treat has become a Halloweenish nightmare. 
 
Where does that leave traditional newspapers - and more specific - dedicated and time-consuming investigative journalism - supposedly one of the cornerstones of democracy and an essential necessity for an informed, functioning world?
 
Daily and weekly newspapers and magazines have no chance to stay abreast of breaking news streaming on the internet and have all compromised by having online editions to keep up with the constant news flood.
 
But at what cost if there is no time to check the facts or if official spokespersons are evasive, incompetent or muzzled by their superiors?
 
In sunny South Africa, the fast-fact-finding mission on short notice/deadline has become Mission Impossible as most authorities - from national to provincial and local governmental departments - have adopted an evasive, no comment policy to any straight media questions. Spinners need at least a few days to string, polish and wrap their half-truths together in a neat, meaningless and politically correct press release . . .
 
No official spokesperson can, want or MAY speak openly and off the cuff anymore, which leaves journalists in a catch 22- position to either leave the story entirely (miss the scoop) or to rely on unconfirmed rumours, hearsay and social media reports to whip up a reasonable account of what allegedly happened according to various sources . . . .   
 
Small wonder that most newspapers have to rely on follow-up stories to rectify the initial misinformation - and often the two accounts differ so dramatically that readers lose trust in the authenticity of the media . . .   
 
media3
    
  
Is die media in gevaarwaters?
Deur Murray La Vita
Waarom het die publiek se vertroue in die media afgeneem?
 
 
’n Groep Afrikaanse medialeiers het hieroor en oor sake soos fopnuus, My fok, Marelize, en die invloed van die moord op Reeva Steenkamp op die nuuslandskap gepraat, berig Murray La Vita
Een van die waterskeidings in die Suid-Afrikaanse joernalistiek die afgelope jare was die moord op Reeva Steenkamp deur Oscar Pistorius op Valentynsdag 2013, sê Pieter du Toit, adjunkredakteur van News24.
 
Hy was een van die deelnemers aan die eerste diskoers in Die Burger se Praat Saam Diskoers-reeks op die KKNK in Oudtshoorn.
 
“Dit was vir ons baie definitief ’n skeiding gewees van hoe ons nuus verpak het vóór 14 Februarie 2013 en ná 14 Februarie 2013. Dit was die eerste keer waar ons in die Afrikaanse media, en ek was destyds by Beeld gewees, ’n brekende storie dádelik en deurlopend op digitale platforms begin dek het. Dit was strydig met hoe ons dit altyd gedoen het by koerante.
“Dít was die eerste waterskeiding. Maar waar ons nou is, moet ons alles wat ons destyds geleer het weer óntleer en nuwe tegnieke en maniere om stories te vertel aanleer. Waar goed vyf jaar gelede rewolusionêr was, is dit amper nou oud.”
Die onderwerp van die diskoers was: Is die media in die gevaarwaters?
 
“Ons vra dit na aanleiding van allerhande studies wat wys dat die publiek vertroue in die media verloor het,” het Ivor Price, gespreksleier, gesê.
 
“Die Edelman-vertroue-indeks vir 2018 het getoon dat openbare vertroue in die media ’n bloedneus gekry het met tot 63% van mense wat glo dat nuusorganisasies eerder groot gehore wil trek as om eerlik verslag te doen.”
 
Hy wou by Willem Jordaan, redakteur van Die Burger, weet of hy so ’n vertrouensbreuk tussen nuusmediums en hul verbruikers sien.
 
Willem Jordaan
 
“Ek dink dit is ’n baie moeilike tyd vir die media internasionaal, maar ook in SuidAfrika. In die aanloop tot die Zondo-kommissie was daar prominente publikasies wat baie seergekry het wat die bevordering van eng politieke belange betref.
 
“Wat ’n ou moet bysê en wat ’n ou moed gee, is dat Sanef, die Suid-Afrikaanse Nasionale Redakteursforum, báie skerp gereageer het en ’n beroep gedoen het op mediahuise oor die land heen om weer te kyk na hul etiese prosedures en hul
nuusprosedures wat daar is om daardie soort van bevordering van eng belange uit te hou. Daarby is die kode van die persombudsman ook versterk en hersien.
In die aanloop tot die Zondo-kommissie was daar prominente publikasies wat baie seergekry het wat die bevordering van eng politieke belange betref. ” – Willem Jordaan
“Maar wat die situasie vir die media in Suid-Afrika veral moeilik maak, is die feit dat die tradisionele kommersiële model besig is om sterk te verander. Tradisionele adverteerders is besig om Facebook en Google toe te skuif, en ofskoon ’n koerant dalk nie in die eerste plek bestaan om geld te maak nie, móét ’n koerant geld maak om te kan bestaan.
 
“Daarom werk ons baie hard daaraan om ’n volhoubare toekoms vir gehaltejoernalistiek in Afrikaans op ’n platform soos Netwerk24 te bou, en ek wil ’n beroep doen op ons lesers om ons in daardie projekte te ondersteun.”
Ons is nie almal so nie
 
Du Toit het die punt gemaak dat die media nie ’n homogene organisme is nie.
 
“Die uitgangspunte en redaksionele benadering en dikwels ook waardes, verskil van titel tot titel. So ek dink die leserspubliek moet ook versigtig wees om die media as een entiteit saam te groepeer en te sê die media is sus of die media is só.
“In die verlede was die media huiwerig om hulle kollegas uit te wys en daar is steeds ’n ongemaklikheid daaroor om kollegas uit te wys wat verkeerd met feite omgaan, maar dit is toenemend so dat daar standpunt ingeneem word.
 
“En wat is die uitwerking? Die invloed van iets soos die Sunday Times se beriggewing oor die sogenaamde Cato Manor-hit squads en die beriggewing oor die sogenaamde 'rogue unit' van Sars – die inligting wat hulle gebruik het was vals én geplant – dít teer-en-veer die hele media. En ek dink dit vind dan inslag by opmerkings deur die publiek dat mense sê die media is sus of die media is só.”
Fopnuus se skuld
Price het Carryn-Ann Nel, joernalis en dosent in die Universiteit Stellenbosch se joernalistiekdepartement, gepols oor die verslag wat daarop dui dat mense minder vertroue in die media het.
“Fopnuus, wat die afgelope paar jare baie toegeneem het, is een van die redes waarom mense vertroue verloor het. Die verslag van Reuters sê 58% van mense is baie meer bewus van fopnuus. Mense se oë het oopgegaan vir hoe fopnuus elke dag om ons is.”
 
Price het aan Kobus Louwrens, mede-stigter van Food for Mzansi, gesê hy hoor die heeltyd mense sê fopnuus is nie die probleem nie, die internet, die digitale era, is die eintlike rede waarom mense vertroue in die media verloor het.
 
“Ek dink dit speel ’n rol; ons almal weet dit was ’n baie ontwrigtende ontwikkeling – dit is soos ’n groot brander wat die tradisionele media getref het en ons is nog altyd besig om te rol en te rol en te probeer om ons voete weer te vind. Maar die positiewe daarvan is dat dit besig is om nuwe geleenthede te skep in die media, want soos julle sê mense raak al hoe meer bewus van fopnuus en dit plaas ’n premie op bronne wat bewys het hulle is betroubaar.
 
“Daar is ook ’n model wat besig is om te ontwikkel waar mense betaal vir inhoud, maar ook waar inhoud betaal word deur byvoorbeeld borge, mense wat voel dit is nodig dat sekere inhoud gedeel word waar die tradisionele media dit nie kan doen nie.”
Goeie nuus, asseblief
Die media se rol het verander, maar die verbruikers se behoeftes het ook verander; daar is byvoorbeeld ’n toenemende behoefte aan goeie of bemoedigende nuus, het Price gesê.
 
Pieter du Toit het hieroor gesê: “Ja, te midde van staatskapings en ontbloting van grootskaalse korrupsie wíl mense positiewe nuus lees. Een van die mees geleesde stories op News24 die afgelope maand was die My fok, Marelize-storie. Mense was mál daaroor gewees.”
 
Marelize Horn
Marelize Holm en haar ma wie se video van Marelize se fietsry-flater die land weke lank aan die vloek gehad het. 
 
Nel het gesê mense hou van emosie in ’n storie.
 
“Die oomblik wat jy aan ’n emosie raak, hetsy dit iemand se lagspiere prikkel of as hulle huil as hulle ’n storie lees . . . Dis altyd goed om daardie balans te hê.”
Esmaré Weideman, voormalige uitvoerende hoof van Media24, het uit die gehoor ’n lansie gebreek vir die gehalte van joernaliste wat ons in Suid-Afrika het.
 
“Ons is geseën met ongelooflik goeie joernaliste en van hulle sit daar op die verhoog en van hulle kry heeltemal te veel kritiek vanuit die Afrikaanse gemeenskap uit.
 
“Terwyl ’n mens baie hartseer moet wees as die integriteit van die media deur sommiges skade berokken word, moet ons ook net baie dankbaar wees dat hiérdie mense onder moeilike omstandighede met min tyd en jong nuuskantore . . . nuus
vinnig moet uitkry en besluite moet neem. En hulle blaas baie min hul eie beuel as dit kom byvoorbeeld by die rol wat die media gespeel het in die oopvlek van staatskaping.
 
“Ons as publiek moet ons koerante en ander nuusplatforms wat geld vra, ondersteun. R99 [maandelikse intekengeld vir Netwerk24] is géén geld vir die gehalte en verskeidenheid van publikasies en joernalistiek wat ons kry nie. Ons behoort eintlik báie meer te betaal daarvoor.”
 
 

Naspers shareholders launch organisation for investigative journalism

2019-02-28 20:00
 

Investigative journalism is one of the cornerstones of our democracy, but is often hampered by a lack of funding, former Naspers chairperson Ton Vosloo said at the announcement of a non-profit organisation for investigative journalism within Media24.

During a conversation at the Centre for Student Communities at Stellenbosch University, Vosloo said the organisation, called Truth First, had been established to help the country's best investigative journalists continue their work.

He and his wife Anet have already made a R3.5m donation to establish it.

They have appealed to Naspers shareholders and concerned South Africans to contribute to Truth First to help responsibly fund investigative journalism.

 "Aside from the financial adaptions the news media has had to make worldwide in the era of the internet and social media, we have a unique challenge in South Africa," Vosloo said. "We have informed, equipped and ingenious journalists who have been responsible for bringing controversial revelations - among other things, state capture - to light. Their ability to do in-depth 'digging' is however often hampered by a lack of resources.

"Journalism of this kind can take months and happens outside the daily news agenda. It is expensive but similarly important that we keep up with this work to sustain our threatened democracy.

"The aims of Truth First are, among other things, to encourage quality investigative journalism in the public interest and to promote an honest, free media that exposes transgressions. It must also contribute to a sense of empowerment by enabling South Africans to hold public institutions accountable.

"In basically my entire adult life as a journalist, I learnt through experience that the cornerstone of democracy in South Africa is a free, independent media," Vosloo said.

"During recent years, it has been proven over and over, with brave and responsible investigative journalism that led to the large-scale exposure of corruption and maladministration across a wide spectrum. It is a gift of grace that I'm in the position to contribute to the establishment of Truth First. May it strengthen our journalism to successfully continue its life sustaining work in new, difficult circumstances."

Journalists working for Media24 will be able to pitch investigative projects that require additional resources to a committee made up of the directors of Truth First. All applications will have to adhere to funding rules.

In addition to the Vosloo couple, the other directors are: Joe Thloloe, former press ombudsman; Charlene Beukes, general manager: News and Lifestyle at 24.com; Adriaan Basson, editor-in-chief of News24; Mondli Makhanya, editor-in-chief of City Press; Henriëtte Loubser, editor-in-chief of Netwerk24; and Oloff Sieberhagen, a lawyer at Marais Müller Hendricks Attorneys.

Thloloe applauded Naspers shareholders for the initiative to give back to journalism and said it was a very innovative way to raise funds for investigative journalism.

"Investigative journalism is really threatened due to publications losing money and cutting costs." 

According to Thloloe, it is often one of the first forms of journalism that is cut, because it takes time and money and removes journalists from the stream of daily news.

"Anyone that appreciates investigative work will want to support this project. The country is where it currently is thanks to those that exposed apartheid and the endemic corruption that we are seeing now. They are the ones that are keeping us informed."

"The biggest gift of a free media is that the public can have peace of mind that they will know the truth," Anet Vosloo said.

"That is the confidence that we want to engender with Truth First: to know that Media24 goes out of its way to make sure readers are part of an honest and sincere inner circle who hears the full story."

Anyone who wants more information about Truth First or wants to make a donation can send an email to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it..

* News24 is a publication of Media24, an affiliate of Naspers.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Related Articles:

You just LOVE your sushi and believe the Norwegian salmon is healthy and good for you?

You might just reconsider after watching the undernearth two videos . . .

sushi

The shocking truth about what is truly happening in the international fish industry - especially farmed fish - has been exposed in two videos. This information has been withheld from the public for too long in order to protect this very lucrative but scandalous and criminal practices that are not only killing off wild fish in drones, but also poison people and cause serious health problems such as cancer, brain contamination, diabetics and many other modern day illnesses.

Even your pet's health may be at risk as the pulp of toxic fish waste are now being used in pet food . . . Misleading labeling- which is nothing but blatant fraud - makes it almost impossible for any country or buyer to trace the origin of these imported frozen salmon fillets and the ingredients in the various byproducts of farmed fish. One out of 3 labels were found to be misleading.

Sushi5

Photo: Norway is the world's largest producer of Atlantic salmon, and around 14 million people around the world enjoy Norwegian salmon every day! Along with fishery, aquaculture is the main industry in Vesterålen, providing valuable opportunities for employment and settlement along the coast.

Renowned researchers, biologists and scientists who have been investigating the fish farming industry all over the world - from Norway to Japan, Vietnam, Denmark, Sweden and Canada - were not allowed to publish their research studies and findings in accredited medical and scientific journals.

They were either forced to resign or threatened, and in some cases attempts were made to falsify their results in order to prevent this latest scandal in the international food industry from becoming public knowledge.

When confronted with the evidence of their research, Norway's Minister of Sea Fisheries refused to comment and claimed ignorance despite proof of her consent and direct involvement. Further investigation revealed that prior to her current position, she worked for years in the dried fish meal pellet industry.

These pellets that are globally used in the farmed fish industry, proved to be the most toxic concoction that not only causes severe deformities in farmed fish, but also poses serious threats to human health. It is linked to brain contamination, genetic disorders, diabetics and various forms of cancer.




Is it a coincidence that diabetics, cancer and disorders related to chemical imbalances in the brain have skyrocketed in the past decade since fish farming became one of the most popular and lucrative businesses in the food industry? Under the false pretense of avoiding a looming food scarcity in he world? While all along this "plastic fish" has no nutritional value and is in fact poisoning people and killing wild fish in the ocean, as well as disturbing the entire marine ecology?

 These two documentary videos should be seen by everybody who loves sushi and were misled into believing that farmed fish is a lucrative and noble solution to a looming global food scarcity . . . Both videos are quite lengthy as they cover in detail the researchers' investigations and findings, but they are more than worth the watch.

Fish Farm Norway

Photo: A Fish Farm in Norway 

Also read: 

 https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link…

https://www.youtube.com/attribution_link…

 
Related Articles: